Jump to content

CazzT

Pathfinder
  • Content Count

    220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CazzT


  1. 11 hours ago, Willard said:

    No just tell me. What is the difference if 20 man company is threatened by like 70 members company and 2 man company is threatened by 20 man company? Because 20-man company doesn´t stand a chance against that mega just like 2 man tribe doesn´t stand a chance against 20-men company. 

    Edit: Btw no limits can stop megas from cooperating together. It is an issue with no solution. Devs simply can´t stop companies from working together if they want. Even without alliances megas can create Mega1-10 companies which simply will work together.

    No is claiming that megas can't work together even with caps.  Stop using that strawman.

    It's a more likely scenario to have 15-20 man companies than it is 50+ man companies, even without megas being part of the equation.  So that lower cap makes more sense.  And I have to wonder why you just assume every big fish will inherently eat the smaller fish.  It's almost like you're only able to think one way and can't comprehend that others think differently.


  2. 1 hour ago, Bonedancer said:

    As it should have been from the beginning. I knew all this "stream sniping" bs wouldn't last long. You can't efficiently play this game and broadcast it to the entire world in a pvp setting and expect everyone to play fair. That's like asking a bank to leave the doors open to the vault and the keys to the front door, along with the alarm code in an envelope stuck to the front door with a note saying, "now please don't step in and rob us." Just the stupidest shit I've ever heard of in my entire life. Good riddens. 

    If you find a bank that does this, let me know?  I would love to retire early.


  3. 2 minutes ago, Garrik said:

    I think you made a mistake by announcing the wipe and changes a month early.

    One side is saying it was announced too early, the other side is saying it was announced too late (game splash screen).  Can't please both, and forewarned is better than having something like this sprung on you.  Dollie said they're less concerned about number of players right now than they are with fixing bugs and implementing the new systems.

     


  4. 23 minutes ago, Realist said:

    you are trying to do a smear campaign

    LMAO  It's not a smear campaign,you dolt!  It's a direct quote of you attacking other people.  The exact thing you told me you don't do while doing that to me and having done it constantly since posting on these very forums.

    41 minutes ago, Realist said:

    Except it’s not a lie

    Only if you outright ignore all the constructive helpful posts I've made.  Piss off troll.


  5. 2 hours ago, Talono said:

    No problem if they make the sub expensive, e.g. loads of several gem types or something.

    But should be achievable also by a grinding solo player.

    This would be good, too.  Something like 6x[material] for each of them.


  6. 12 minutes ago, SIEGEGUN said:

    Completely disagree. Mashing the modes together is not a good idea. Believe what you will.

    I don't think anyone is asking for this to be the only option.  I've only seen this presented as an extra ruleset/set up for additional servers.


  7. Just now, Realist said:

    How have I attacked you.

    Both of these are in reply to knivet talking about me specifically.  You will claim that you weren't talking about me, but that's a cop out.

     

    19 minutes ago, Realist said:

    Bashing a person for their beliefs is another. I have seen you do it plenty of times.

     

    11 minutes ago, Realist said:

    Yeah there is a few people in here that do that.

    ---------------

    11 minutes ago, Realist said:

    Saying that you do that is also not an attack.

    It is when it's a lie.

    12 minutes ago, Realist said:

    I have the right to tell people to ignore you if you may or may not be harassing them. See I didn’t even say you were. 

    You are implying that I am with "may or may not be".  You're using weasel words and being obtuse with your insults so you can claim that you're not attacking people.


  8. 29 minutes ago, SIEGEGUN said:

    Have you seriously played NA PvP?

    Yes, I have.

    29 minutes ago, SIEGEGUN said:

    Unofficials vs Official is like night and day.

    Some are.  Many are not.  You're lumping all unofficials together.  There's too variety in unofficials to do be able to compare them like that.  You have to compare unofficials that are similar to official.  Which is what I was doing with [A1], which I played on in addition to NA PVP.


  9. 6 minutes ago, Knivet said:

    Yeah i agree, went to see his profile, all hi does is critism other people meanings.

    Then you're not looking at my profile.  I provide information and ask people to question what they're saying.  Of course, to a troll, that would be "critism other people meanings" because you aren't interested in constructive feedback and discussion.

    13 minutes ago, Realist said:

    Yep. Bashing a company is one thing. Bashing a person for their beliefs is another.

    Only if you're trying to move the goal post.

    14 minutes ago, Realist said:

    I have seen you do it plenty of times.

    You've seen me call people out for being Chicken Littles and lying.  I like how both of you are being extremely selective with what you're reading while profile stalking me, though.

    15 minutes ago, Realist said:

    I don’t attack people on here.

    ROFLMAO.... You're doing that right now.


  10. 47 minutes ago, Knivet said:

    Do you have something to back it up then? guess not

    I'm not the one making the asinine claims.  Burden of proof is on you.

    26 minutes ago, Realist said:

    Some people just want to bash other people. Just be the bigger person. Not talking crap just good advice

    Says the guy who has done almost nothing but bash the devs and the game...


  11. 46 minutes ago, SIEGEGUN said:

    It is only awesome because it is an unofficial. This could never work out as things stand now.

    I'm not seeing why it wouldn't work for official.  Only thing [A1] really changed are the rates and flagged specific zones for PvE/PvP and the zones STOD spawn in.  Other than that, they didn't really change anything.  They use all the same/current patches as official.  If it can work on unofficial, why would it not work on official?


  12. On 3/7/2019 at 2:06 PM, Chucksteak said:

    The real argument no one has the "balls" to say openly is summarized as this;

    "I was awesome at finding people and companies with litttle to no defense or personnel online and i felt smarter and better at this game than them for it. " #offlineFTW #sleepwell

    Otherwise, they would say,

    "Fucking finaly,  i have a tool that lets me know there should be someone there to fight!"

    I wish I could Like your post more than once for this.


  13. 2 hours ago, gnihar said:

    Bullet force, it will all depend on how firmly will they enforce tribe limit and alliance limit rules on Colonies.

    Nobody wants stealth teaming, and if the devs wipe such tribes, and further cripple caps on alliances and tribe numbers, then we are talking about the right direction. In this particular case even I will be willing to adopt subterfuge and act like I accept teaming, and secretly I shall be reporting to the devs.

    What do you mean by "stealth teaming"?  If you mean two companies agreeing to cooperate and work together but they aren't actually allies, why would that be against the rules?


  14. 7 hours ago, Fly200 said:

    Then remove the patch date from splash screen when you start the game dammit!  That’s what’s hard to understand!

    You were bitching in another thread about not being told soon enough about the wipe and now you're asking for the splash screen to removed entirely.  Why are you posting on these forums, the fries are done and I don't like my fries burnt.  Get back to work.

×
×
  • Create New...