Change the Leaderboard scoring requirements!

[reapo 46]

For NA and EU PvP change the scoring requirements for the top companies to actual PvP scoring instead of it being based off land claims. The best companies should be based off their ability to PvP, not their ability to place a flag down and wait 10 minutes or 4 hours (depending on where its at). Give point values to things like large storage chests, beds and ships and for each one destroyed you get point accumulation. Sink a ship at sea, 50 points, destroy a bed 10 points, destroy a storage chest, 5 points. Sinking anchored ships are with 0 points (can put that on a time limit to where they have to be anchored for 30 minutes or so so they can't be exploited).

Since the upkeep cost is being added (I"m assuming in March, with the big update), then the unit you measure the best should also be changed. For NA & EU PvP, that unit is PvP. Make it work Devs! This allows more chances for any number of companies to be at the top, not just the companies that are alpha tribes. The better PvPer wins and they should be at the top.

[MeatSammich 214]

Eh, not so much. With the upkeep cost, it would be even more accurate for the leaderboard if you took the land, kept the land, and could pay for the land.

Having it based on PVP A: Encourages people to just go roflstomp everyone they see, for no reason, even more than they do now, and B: Is way too exploitable if you just feed mats to somone outside your company for them to build things for you to destroy.

[Tillman 19]

The leaderboard is pointless altogether.  There’s  no way to actually measure who is on top. I’ve actually seen some solo players who should be at the top of the leaderboard.