Jump to content

Enki Anunnaki

Pathfinder
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    498

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Enki Anunnaki

  1. Posted

    my first brig i remember crashing into an island at full speed because i thought i could close all the sails by my lonesome without npc's in time. i was wrong. ships can fly into the sky. who would have thought. 

    my second brig i built got blown to bits by an automatic fire ship of the damned. 5 seconds from contact with the sod, i was sunk and wishing i took my raft out instead.

    Ohhhh the good ol' days! I miss the excitement of not knowing what to expect.

    • Like 1

  4. Posted

    let's be real... the devs had a reddit channel with direct communication with all the mega leaders up till not too long ago. if the devs really wanted empires to work, they would have had actually listened to the mega leaders when they said get rid of the old claim system and use the settlement system and raid windows in the empires server just with increased company limits. the devs didn't listen and we all knew what the result was going to be... idk why everyone is so surprised with those results... we all saw it coming.

    • Like 2

  6. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Martyn said:

    I think the main problem is some owners don't make ranks and don't make people admin and so on.  ie they don't trust you.. or they bring you in, you get everything killed, use all the resources, leave stuff untidy and they throw afit and kick you all out.. Which is why I don't join other people's companies, i make my own.  And I make ranks and make admins and let them run the company.

    true. but let's be real, if the voting system was implemented, barely anyone would sign on to a dictatorship lead company. (the old way). most would like the idea of potential advancement and standing based on their proven value to the group. those individuals would shine. the original owner would need to be worthy and respectful to maintain his position, otherwise he'll be replaced and as long as he tried and was respectful, he won't be kicked and he will still have respect and time to improve his standing with his peers for the next election. even if a group of friends joined and pooled their votes, it would be hard to beat a worthy leader.

  7. Posted · Edited by Enki Anunnaki

    7 minutes ago, Martyn said:

    So.. you get someone to invite you to their group. Few days later you get them to invite your mates, because you're oh so cool and hardworking etc.

    Then when your mates are all in, you vote the guy you build the company up out, take over, kick him out, take all his stuff.

    Now I know why there isn't a voting system.

    you sound like you're talking about globalist immigration policy IRL 😉 .. perhaps new members have to wait an election or two to vote. again, it would be up to the current leader who gets invited, has power to invite and such. much like it already is with the risk of insiding with the current leadership model. 

  9. Posted · Edited by Enki Anunnaki
    and your right i do have experiance in this game (and life) enough to know some people are not equipped to lead and it's sad to see a group fall apart because they are stuck with that "leader" and lose everything anyways.

    21 minutes ago, Bolognapwny said:

    You literally just made a post about voting in a new leader.... you have so much experience in this game... you've bypassed HUGE issues with the game already.

    correction: i literally made a post suggesting players have the option to join companies that have the option of electing a leader that represents the company instead of just himself.

    boo fucking hoo. game breaker, i know.

  12. Posted · Edited by Enki Anunnaki

    12 minutes ago, Sulfurblade said:

    So I don't Agree with the OP for my company!  

    However there are some company's that this type of thing could work for....  So I say it would be a good option to be able to ENABLE a voting system inside of a company!  

    That way there are more options for people of different strokes!!!

    i just believe it should be an option at company inception, or turned on without the option for a future/current leader/owner to turn it off right away without being reelected and be a tyrant. options is awesome. people will choose options over no options almost every time.

    7 minutes ago, Bolognapwny said:

    My god, if you don't like the leader quit and start again or take it back... this sounds more like self-entitled millennial BULLSHIT where you want what others have....

     

    Man up and start your own group... a vote system... my god.

    my god it seems like you're just frightened at the prospect of losing power in your own company my god lmao.

    man up, you don't gotta force your pettiness on everyone to play "leader"

  13. Posted · Edited by Enki Anunnaki
    In b4 trolls: Im also not the first to suggest an elected leader. The idea was first thrown on this forums about electing settlement governors before the wipe was even announced. ;)

    39 minutes ago, Bolognapwny said:

    lmao yeah man, you totally are the reason they implemented a system thats already been around for years in other games... totally your original idea... I can see now this IDEA IS FLAWLESS!!!!

    i understand that you might lack deductive reasoning on the fly so ill repeat it for you. I never implied that i was the reason or the first to suggest. i said i suggested it before it was implemented and was givin ridicule just like i am today for this idea. at least you have enough knowledge to know it works in other games and at least grasp logic enough to see why i suggested it. its the same logic that makes me believe that a ceo elected by shareholders is a good idea as well.

    it works well in real companies, breeds healthy competition, company advancement, respect and incentive for greatness.

  17. Posted · Edited by Enki Anunnaki
    combined my last posts.

    what i am suggesting is not insiding, its called shareholders having a stake in the company and wanting to select a ceo that does whats best for the company. it works in real life, it will work in this game as well. i understand where you are coming from, but if i ceo who owns a company and wants to crash n burn it, he shouldn't be allowed to take on investors and be able to get away with defrauding them.

    perhaps two systems should be implemented that can be observed at company admittance. 1. a king that can't be usurped and can be a tyrant at his leisure. 2. a ceo that is selected by his peers, weekly. 

    Guess which system most people will choose to join. at least you'd have an idea of what kind of company atmosphere you'd be joining without intense research, that's for sure.

  18. Posted

    1 minute ago, Realist said:

    Wait so you just vote out the leader on a weekly basis? Nah, your fight club was a good idea and hopefully that went well or now that this happened hopefully you do it.

    but no, it is the players responsibility to research the company they are joining. Regardless of the kind of person the leader is if he started the company and put in the time to build it up there should definitely not be this voting system.

    you gotta remember what game this is. You are going to find that most of the players that play this game are going to be bad. Just because they are bad doesn’t mean they should be stripped of their work just like you didn’t want to be stripped of yours. The difference is he took the time alto start up a company.

    But that's the thing, it's the company that builds the company, not just a figurehead. I've lead a large group prewipe and i know better than to be so arrogant as to take credit for most my company's past accomplishments and glories.. also, i spent more time building this group i mentioned in the op, training them in pvp than the actual leader was, then i was stripped of my rank, time and work for questioning a sociopath. there should be consequences for incompetency, just like there is in real life corporations. a company shouldn't have to dissolve and go bankrupt in order to get rid of corruption, there needs to be options.

  19. Posted

    Now, ive wanted to write about this topic before as i've seen this issue with companies and individuals but now im compelled to actually write about it because i have finally recently actually become the victim of these kind of events.

    Im not gonna do names or go to into extreme detail of this event here, but i've recently experienced an instance where i had joined day one of wipe, a new lawless company devised of random people in the lawless zone. (many of which were solo's or people that had come from pve servers prewipe). the owner of the new pvp company who seemed grounded at first, eventually flipped on a dime.. had a mental breakdown.. screaming, lying, exaggerating/distorting events, blaming others for his negligence and kicking out people all willy nilly, the whole 9. textbook sociopathic scream fit kinda episodes..

    It was discussed among many in the chat about the incompetence and outrage (right before the episode that got me booted from the company and banned from the discord lulz...) (sucked cuz i wish i had added a lot of those guys because now i don't remember their tags) We knew that we didn't wanna lose all our hard earned farming/taming/prestige from pvp and start a new group... talked about how we wished he would have resigned from ownership for the good of the company.. but alas.

    Wouldn't it be great if the leader was actually chosen by and represented the will and ambition of the people that actually make up the company.

    Please make a weekly company owner/leader vote system, @Jatheish. You would be a hero.

×
×
  • Create New...