Jump to content

Arykos

Pathfinder
  • Content Count

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Arykos


  1. 1 minute ago, SouthSideChicago said:

    I don't like to argue on forums or even talk shit too much. It doesn't do anything productive. I'll still do it from time to time, just to shit on kids like arykos, but i'd much rather see him in game. one thing people always fail to realize is that no matter what is said or done, there will ALWAYS be a few people who will talk shit just because they are behind a keyboard. 

    my dear friend, I'm pretty sure everyone knows who is the "shit kid" in this thread.

    I can already see on your reaction, which kind of player you are.

    But hell randoms tend to think they are the best players ingame, because they can bash some noobs or won a war.


  2. 2 minutes ago, SouthSideChicago said:

    To be fair, look at my original post. I never said i was top tier did i? arykos did. As a matter of fact, my next post after that I specifically said im not the best. You guys need hooked on phonics? cause you guys are having a real hard time with reading comprehension.

    that was a question. It's not like the things you mentioned are wrong, but you should acknowledge that you cannot judge other people without knowing them or have an clue what people are doing. Based on your comments you just sound like an arrogant random to me.

    I mean wtf is wrong with you "sit down" as if other people wouldn't know how to play the game. ( well probably most doesn't but still..)

    You and also your mates are not the only people knowing how to play.


  3. 35 minutes ago, MajorAvatar said:

    The split of the servers is a nice idea -IF- the Mega tribes would have been interested to fight each other, they are not so much interested in doing that, they prefer hit soft targets (small groups) so i  believe these mega-tribes will either play only on colonies as multiple smaller groups, working together or play on both servers. 

    This is not something that has an easy fix, unless there is a game mechanic that does not allow groups that are not officially allied to work together in any way, not seeing how that could be achieved,

    no, most mega members did want to play in smaller groups, but they got forced to play in megas to have some more security against offline raids etc.


  4. 3 hours ago, SouthSideChicago said:

    This guy Kast is absolutely correct. I'm in one of those "mega-companies" and also one of the 10% of our players who actually goes out and PvP's in ANY situation.. Without mentioning names, the absolute top tier players in this game know every other major group/company (not just the top 10)  Problem is, every single one of those players couldn't do dick without crafters, tamers, farmers, I can go on for hours about this game and the would've and should'ves or the positives and the negatives but I try not to argue online. I say what i think and our leader talks with Jat and some other guy about "opinions and the state of the game". Most of the shit i see on these forums are people saying the same things over and over and opinions, which is fine, but all i need is someone with 500+ posts already talk shit to me. I might of played this game too much, but i know bullshit when i see it. I'm glad i saw Kast post this.

    So you think you are "top tier" player? based on what?


  5. 4 hours ago, boomervoncannon said:

    It’s the same people in every thread whining about other posters expressing views they don’t like.

     

    See how that works both ways? 😏

    no that doesn't work both ways, since I'm not the one constantly whining about devs. That has nothing to do about their views.


  6. 2 minutes ago, Grongash said:

    While it clearly is over exaggerated the general meassage isnt that far off. We are talking wipe, so this is about the official servers only. If you take the playerbase of the last month before the wipe announcement and substract the pure maintenance loggers you get a pretty small actual playerbase. So far no one of my company, friends list and the people that settled around our region on the official EU PvE Server see any reason to go on if they plan further wipes. Lets be honest, there isnt much to this game other than building in PvE.

    So you can take an educated guess that at least the PvE part of the game will be screwed if they go on like this. And the PvP part got his own set of problems. Good luck if you think they will ever sort the Chinese problem or get a grip on the hacking issues. Give it a few months and you will all pay taxes to your new chinese feudal lords.

    well if they don't want to play the game they have left anyway... ofc there is not much to do... that's why people should play pvp

    even if you lose your base on pvp, you can just rebuild and play the game... but well some people don't like to lose their "hard" build stuff and they better play in boredom

    and no we won't pay anything to any chinese... just get your ass off and defend and fight for your land. don't be afraid because of some chinese


  7. 1 hour ago, SouthSideChicago said:

    If there's another wipe after this one, nobody will play. guaranteed. why level up or do anything that's just going to be gone again? This isn't rust. They already mentioned bringing in more official servers, so making  the current NA and EU PvP servers Legacy servers is the most likely option. Reward players that have been here since day 1. Funny thing is, there are other similar games already being made as we speak. If these devs care one bit about the future of this game and it's community, they wont do another wipe. You saw what happened to their player count within 48 hours of the official wipe announcement lol. 

    funny how some randoms always know what other people will do or no


  8. 3 hours ago, MindOfMadness said:

    LOL...  If I "don't want to accept"?!...  Dude! I linked you a post from Jat that clearly says it's for small groups, solo players, and large groups but it's you that can't accept it. WTF do you think "accessible" means exactly?  They want everyone to be able to play the game whatever their play style is. That doesn't mean it's made for large groups...  IT MEANS IT"S MADE FOR EVERYONE...  You can't actually be so fucking stupid that you can't understand this.  FFS pull your head out of your ass and "ACCEPT" reality.

    for real though, link a dev post or company statement that says it's a game for large groups...  I'll wait...

    ok kid. you still don't understand the post of jat. It's wasting my time to explain it again.

    • Like 1

  9. 10 hours ago, Captain Jack Shadow said:

    If you aren't aware, people were/are ripping it for being too much like ARK...saying it is simply ARK with ships.  The general public do not want to play another ARK.  We already have ARK.  We don't want another ARK, and the Devs don't want to make another ARK.  They do want to use what can be reused, which is smart, but they don't want this to be ARK with ships.  My suggestion was just an idea.  You toss around ideas on what can put the focus on ships, and going to other islands.  People do not want to play a game where you have to fear traveling across the map, because your base is so fragile, so easy to take down when you aren't there.

    The point is that it wasn't a garbage idea.  It was simply that you do not like the idea.  Fair enough.  We will never get everyone to like everything.  When the game is done, everyone will still have their own ideas of what changes could make it better, and we will never get everyone to agree on any one idea.  That's OK.  That's just part of being human.

    no it was a garbage idea for sure. Your idea has nothing to do with the game. You can't change the whole gamestyle. I'm not going to repeat myself. You still don't accept other opinions. This game is not ARK , it's far from beeing ARK. So you are the general public and I'm the lonely survivor? fear traveling across the map? Base is fragile? I think I missed something out on this game, or some people just have no idea how to play it

     dude pls do everyone a favour and play your star citzien and leave this game alone if you are so unhappy.

    • Like 1

  10. 4 hours ago, MajorAvatar said:

    The above statement shows that it is you, sir, that is the PVE player playing on a PVP server. It is you, that want to have PvP go nice and easy, as you prefer hitting bases of offline players instead of declaring war and actually have to fight for it.

    Now we can argue about game mechanics all day long, but this game does not have true skill based PvP game mechanics in the first place.

     

    There you are, nothing easier than raiding offline bases and ships.

    Anyway, the point of the Original post was, that I feel the game should become more orientated around ships and that *if* Mortars are allowed to hit ships, give ships a way to return the fire. Getting OFF the ship to climb ON the mountain to disable the mortar is entirely possible, indeed - but my point is aimed more towards 'make this game less ARK and more Pirates' by moving the focus point of the game to ship, ship PvP, raiding with ships and less to big island bases and PvP with Animals (aka AvA).

    I want more ships, less tames and islands

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/527647237245763614/556501342345101312/adw.png

     

    and you just get more ships with more islands and more people who got some land to play the game. so whats the point of this?


  11. 14 hours ago, Captain Jack Shadow said:

    The only thing that was garbage was your answer.  It wasn't thought out.  It was an emotional answer, like that of a toddlers, because you snowflakes are throwing a temper tantrum that your offline PvO is being removed.


    Star Citizen is, and always was going to be about ships.  The Crowd Funding record was 10.3 million dollars, for the Apple Watch.  Star Citizen smashed that at over 200 million.  In that game, your ships will despawn when you leave the game.  In that game, when you go to a port, and land on a pad, the ship despawns.  Nobody can offline it.  It's about ships, not bases, and yet far far more people play that, and far more people have bought into it.  So just because you didn't like the idea, doesn't make it garbage.  If you want to debate points, fine.  I am all about that, and agree that no one person has all the answers.  It's through the debating of ideas point by point that we learn which are viable, and which are not.  If you don't have the patience to do that, stop posting.

    why are you insulting me dude? My answer isn't emotionaly. It's simply a fact. But with your offline random "argument" coming in of nowhere I see you have your fordefined stubborn opinion not beeing able to accept others.

    Think through your idea while watching what this game is about.

    It's not made for just sailing around, maybe you should play sid meier's pirates instead.

    great for star citizen, but if you haven't noticed this is another game. This is not a revamp of star citizen, maybe of ark tho.

    So your ideas should be to improve atlas and not to play star citizen. It's like I bring in the idea to make it like a new wow addon.. this is simply stupid, since people are not here to play these games..

    • Like 1

  12. 18 hours ago, MindOfMadness said:

    You mean like the boosted rates?

    Or the reduced claim times?

    Or maybe you're referring to the nerfs across the board on everything from tames to SotD?

    Or maybe you think the devs are joking when they say the game is for solo players too?

    Now...   Could you be a bit more specific about said game mechanics?

    giphy.gif

    they always stated it's for large companies. If you don't wanna accept that then don't try to argument against it. " to make the game more accessible for smaller groups and solo players " doesn't mean its made for soloplayer. They just want those people not give up for obviously reasons. login play the game, you will find out yourself if you watch it from a 3rd perspective. I'm too tired to explain the game mechanics.


  13. 3 hours ago, Bullet Force said:

    So its a little slice of lame PVE whenever you need it? Yea no thanks. Lets leave PVE to PVE servers. PVP servers do not need safe spaces.

    people tend to force other people into their playstyle when they got rekt by someone.

    I mean this idea above is absolutly garbage.

    • Like 1

  14. 39 minutes ago, MindOfMadness said:

    The devs have repeatedly said otherwise...

    Example: https://steamcommunity.com/app/834910/discussions/0/1742230617609616394/?ctp=4#c1742230617611844643

    This really is a tired argument that literally has zero proof to substantiate yet people like the quoted poster continue to scream it ad nauseum praying to the Atlas gods it will somehow become true and pretending they are informed when they are quite obviously not.

    well if u have any idea of the game mechanics it is more than obvious that this game is not made for soloplayers. If you don't see that.. then put in the word of your choice here..

    the "proof" you posted is against ZERGS, which does not mean a group of people, it means a massive amount of people...

    it's still not made for soloplayer.

    So nice proof, nice argument... stop discredit other people, you are obviously not informed.

     


  15. 8 minutes ago, travis843 said:

    Yeah i explored the past few weekends before the wipe announcement. After you build all the ship types and weapons and armor of high quality blue prints, exploring is really all there is to do if you cant get enough people to do the powerstone quest. Rather than a wipe id rather see them lower the level of the golden age ruin enemies. I mean why cant it be like most games where they equal your current level.

    Because this game is made to play in grp and not alone?

    well then I suggest you to play pvp so u have something to do


  16. 4 hours ago, Talono said:

    Is this some kind of human language ? Contribute to the topic please.

    Fact is, live servers are empty, devs stopped communication with the community and players are frustrated.

    Best option would be to show some balls and drop wipe & slavery patch.

    Or wipe immediatelly, bring the slavery patch live and save costs for the PTR. Improvements can be done during live phasis as well.

    ok waheheheeheheheeheheh everything sucks waeeheheeheh

    did I contribute like you now ? Well I did 😃

    What about u give some good ideas in feedback area instead of constantly crying towards devs?


  17. 2 hours ago, travis843 said:

    Im with you on all counts. Lost tames to alphas, ships to SoDs and cyclones pushing me into rocks. Lost 2 ships to chinese overweighting the ships. Yet i still stayed. Its not about the land to me, but losing all my ships and tames along with my 220 disvovery points and lvl 60. Im all for a better game but jeez give me more t han a hat for almost 500 hours of testing for ya and losing all my hard work. It like you build a real brig by hand then they burn it to the ground and give you a grapeshot games hat lmao just wow. Not to sound ungrateful or anything lol

    220 discoverypoints?? sweet xD I have over 1k

×
×
  • Create New...