Jump to content

Asanna

Pathfinder
  • Content Count

    219
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Asanna


  1. The lowest of the low will be 5K, then all the serious bugs will be worked out, itll rise to about 7 again then something will break. Itll go back down to that 5k for the people leaving (either again or for the first tine) where as the few remaining players will be those who returned and are happy with the changes and the people who are here for the long haul.

    In about 8 months there will be a HUGE game change that will bring the numbers back up to about 11-15k and then it will dwindle again until console release. Itll rise again and possibly even more than seen recently and then it will die down with the console focus.

    This is just how these games work, its predictable.


  2. 1 hour ago, Gindorf said:

    A heat map you say? Where might 1 find that?

     

    1 hour ago, gumbyc said:

    Sorry I'm so stupid. Whats the heat map.

     

    A heat map is a tracker map that shows current player counts upon refresh. The person two replies up above me linked a good one to assist


  3. 4 minutes ago, gumbyc said:

    It's obvious that a lot of us don't have your skill set and don't know where to look. I spend many hours sailing and stopping every once in awhile and look just to find flags with long timers on them. I hope they do something soon or many more will give up.

    All I do is watch the heat map for a couple days and head to the server with the least amount of players and start searching. Pretty easy strat considering.

    I have land in tundra if you're on NAPVE and want it.


  4. While I agree with most parts I will play devils advocate and promote myself.

    There are people who sell land and rent it super cheap to help those in need. I do this myself as well as many others in my alliances. I've also gone hunting for land and found plenty open spots which I have claimed for specific people asking in Discord. Only to have them tell me "oh I dont want to live there" hence why I'm stuck with the amount of land I have.

    Granted this is me speaking from the PVE standpoint. I could go sailing right now and find at minimum 4 spots. It's there it's just hard to find if you dont know where to look.

    I will agree i think companies should have a limit placed on them (maybe like 5 flags per company member) to limit the abuse.

    That being said no matter how a solution could be mentioned theres still the possibility of griefers over lapping and making building impossible for you, theres the lawless foundation spam, there are ways around things like that and people will abuse it.

    I also do agree the 20 day timer is harsh. Jat said it would be two weeks. 14 days =/= 20. I know vacations are important. And it sucks if you're a solo player and want to go away if they make the timer 2 weeks, but they should enable ally's to refresh your timers as another benefit to an alliance


  5. 7 hours ago, Humcitysav said:

    You can declare war on an ally company. We did this with one of our allies, and I would recommend you ally before declaring war. This way, you can actually board eachother’s ships for boarding actions. Otherwise you’ll just be confined to shooting cannons at eachother which is fun, but a mock battle of 2 schooners vs 1 galleon is more fun. 

    It refused to let us declare war, as you can see in the video when we were allied. I had made it 3 times and sent it to him with no notice on his side until he left the alliance.
    I don't know if this was an intentional change from when you guys did it, or if it's a bug or something (this video was literally taken 5 mins before posting, so 3 days ago)

    5 hours ago, arzosah said:

    How far in the future can you set the end date of the war?  Is there a way to make it indefinite?

    It's all based on in-game days, so if you want it for a long time you'll have to plan for that and figure it out that way, 1 in-game day i think is about 48 minutes. If that helps


  6. 6 minutes ago, Bullet Force said:

    So your saying the game should adopt a mechanic that has proven to be a failure and of which you have acknowledged it is a failure?

    Nope, never in anything I ever said did it say that at all. I said that's what they should apply because that's all the know how to do. 
    What i said was "that's as close as we are going to get"
    No matter WHAT we want, the Devs wont do it. They will "work with what they know" and apply that.

    Edit: In case that hasn't been clear from day 1.

×
×
  • Create New...