Jump to content

Megalithic

Pathfinder
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    102

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Megalithic

  2. Posted

    4 hours ago, Detonator said:

    This one is kind of game ending for me tbh, In my opinion this takes all the variety and versatility out of the game, for me this is the reason I play these games because sometimes the person that dares to be different can do good and.  I honestly hope this one gets changed back personally.

    just build a galleon and put them in the gunports problem fixed

    • Like 2

  6. Posted

    8 hours ago, uaf said:

    The irony in this thread.. 

    "Remove PVE, if you like PVE go play private servers" 😄 What a waste of human space.

    Literally saying to remove PVE so players that like PVE can go play on a PVE server.. so.. keep PVE server ? 🙂 

    Afterwards it's just people telling their opinion and the OP saying "no, you suck I don't agree with your opinion but you have to agree with mine".

    Seriously.. enough with these types of threads, everyday a few popup on the forums with "I have ideas that if you don't listen to the game will die", "I have big ideas that nobody thought of that will save this game", etc..

    Thats why the chinese got it right! we need slaves to gather shit and make our boats so we can murder other companies and their slaves ! You Get it!

  7. Posted

    4 hours ago, Bolognapwny said:

    1.  No they do not.... show me proof. 

    2. No idea wtf this even means.

    3.  They do exist they are called private servers.

    4.  Nice argument... lots of points made here.

    5.  Refer to statement #4 you fall into this again.

    6.  Is your asshole jealous at the amount of shit that just fell out of your mouth?

    1. Cstg / destiny / dynasty(jat if sunk) vs the fed/owo/tpg  these are mega companies they kill each other alot.

    2. Care bear's will never know.

    3.Private servers are for those who cant play without cheat/modifications to the SURVIVAL GAME they are trying to survive.

    4.Thanks i try to be thorough.

    5. Refer to statement 4 for your question on statement 5.

    6.My bunghole is alway's jelly of my food hole.. for it will never taste.

    • Thanks 1

  8. Posted

    2 hours ago, Bolognapwny said:

    Scrap PVE servers - Its almost as if no one has played a Sandbox game before... Economies just like in real life produce conflict.... you can't have an economy without PVE'ers... you need PVE'ers on PVP servers for it to work... and dividing your PVE and PVP player base is the most hurtful thing you can do to your game.  Granted with this... you have to create an environment that they can be safe in.... (Think how Eve is setup)

    Scrap Empires servers -  No one is going to play this game but the zerg minded people and they will have no one to fight... Its already proven that MEGAs don't attack MEGAs... they are literally comprised of the WORST pvpers, and PVEers.  Not just in skill, but it knowledge.  They "zerg" up because they are lazy... they want to do everything fast... everything a MEGA represents is what is wrong with gaming now days.  Look at BLDX one of the larger companies... so A.D.D. stricken they mass quit to go play ANOTHER BR... 

     

    You need to focus on small organized Crews... and I would change company label to "Crew"  You can have a "Crew" up to 50 players.  I still feel that you should do away with alliances.... If people want to word of mouth alliance... they still gotta deal with hostile NPCs and it makes it that much harder for them to work... granted they will still work... and they should ( enemy of my enemy ).

     

    You are going to need NPC factions... this game won't work without it.... Your players will create the content, you need to create the sand for the sandbox.

     

    You need to limit cannons on ships to gunports only... I don't know how many times this needs to be stated.

     

    You need to overhaul your siege equipment, and stop using the mindset of spamming buildings as being the way you fight.  Mortars shouldn't be the ANTI-BOAT, and Sieging Meta....

     

     

    1.Mega's Do Attack Mega's

    2. I'm for Empire Tear's are delicious.

    3. Pve servers Need to exist, They are for snowflakes that cant Handle PvP

    4. Limiting Canons to Gun ports on ships, Refer to Statement #3 you fall in this group.

    5. Mortars Are fine Siege weapons are fine Buildings are fine. 

    6.We live in a pvp world ruled by PVE'ers, pve'ers  call this.... Murder.

  14. Posted

    10 hours ago, Talono said:

    Well, this i a good point. Instead of wasting their time into creating slave empire claim systems they should bring fixed gun positions on ship. These front/back large cannon shotgun ships must be removed.

    And these ugly all-cannons-to-one-side-box ships.

    Dear devs, just check when the last time a gun port has been built into a ship by a player and maybe some enlightment will come to you.

    there are pve servers you know where you can snowflake around as you please.

    • Sad 1

  17. Posted

    On 3/5/2019 at 12:57 AM, RavenRetired said:

    There is a fundamental problem with the rear/front stacked cannons on ships. A real ship outfitted this way would sink/flounder/hog(look it up if you dont know what hogging of a wooden ship is). Basically putting all the weight on a ships front/rear, made it unsailable, and or sink very fast. I understand this is a video game, and if they want to deny real life physics, they are more than welcome to. But the front/rear loaded meta has suppressed the naval combat, and made it frequently a game of who can kite who. By no means am i suggesting that war ships had NO front or rear cannons, typically the captains cabin was put in storage and a cannon was run out in its place. But this one was or maybe 3, with the other cannons being in the broadside. Similar with chase cannons. It was not for lack of desire to have more front cannons, it was the effect the weight had on the ship that prevented designs like we have seen in atlas. I have 2 solutions to radically change the naval meta.

    1:Weight on the front/rear of ships has an effect, IE if not balanced the ship is 25%slower, or some type of system that addresses the unrealistic stacking of cannons on the front/rear of ships. To this end, side loaded ships with only cannon on one side should also be penalized, as this is also a ship that would not sail, or at least would not sail well. I am honestly open on this one, but SOMETHING needs to be done to address how the weight is balanced on a ship. 

    2: Heavy cannons can only snap to LARGE gun ports, period. NO heavies on decks, and a galleons broadside would be what it should be, longer ranged, and harder hitting than the other classes of ships. 

    there are dragons and undeads in this game its fantasy so forward/rear canons work.

  18. Posted

    Who Ever designed this, Thought it up, And Green lit this Care bear PVE/RP Bullshit Needs to be fired and hanged then set on fire. 

    12 minutes ago, pvg103breda said:

    first of all, all servers will be wiped. bye bye bye, time.

     

    the new pvp stuff is really bad. scheduled raid system. remove the pvp server and play pve only. we want to attack whenever we like...…...

    people will drop the game!!!!

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...