Alias
-
Content Count
34 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Alias
-
-
Again with the idea, hardcore = offline raid
Men you never played with real Hardcore players.
None played DarkFall here? One of the best PvP sandbox game (with tons of bugs and problem ofc) but still siege on settlements were announced to achieve real mass pvp
-
My whole company is not playing ATM but most of us will come back to try pts and post wipe server.
I think most of the companies are in the same situation ^^
Furthermore if their target of moving the gameplay from base sitting to sea will be achieved there will be more action with the same amount of players. Also being more newbie friendly less new players will leave the game.
I have hope!
- 4
-
Yeah all these pro hardcore players who just sit in a zerg company is laughable xD
-
6 minutes ago, Alasson said:where are the pro of being offline raided? lol
You use as defence the pros of being offline raided but you don't even write one? srsly?The pros of offline raid are that carebears can achieve something. They have to play too...
-
Nice question.
-
If atlas will be cleaned by all the random NPC/mount running (also simplifying it) it would gain much more love. Actually the amount of box/mount randomly lost of moving is making managing them a mess
-
23 hours ago, Alasson said:I would like to read something more about the next patch by devs. to solve this and other issues
You got what you were wishing! We got a neutral tag now
- 1
-
Yeah player is toxic
-
16 hours ago, Kappinski said:Well you could use one Alliance for other Settlements and one Alliance for the members of your own Settlement. But that gets complicated/impossible the moment you get a second island.
I think it would be nice to have something in between enemy and ally that is ONLY for Companys on your Settlement.
"Settler" would be neat
press [E] "Invite to Settlement"
They appear as yellow, not red and thats it!becoming an ally is precious because of the limit. I agree that you want companys that have some value. I wouldn't mind little factions who want to build cute villages. They pay tax after all
But if my settlement is being attacked by someone I want to know who is friend and who is foe.
Otherwise it would force small companys to merge into bigger ones. Maybe that's the reason?
Exactly what the OP was saying we need another way to mark company as friendly (for cohabitation) or the ally limit will be a problem. I found it a major problem if not solved.
I like also the settler idea
-
Yeah it's my best solo experience so far
- 1
-
That's actually a good idea. Something to fix the issue is needed
-
2 hours ago, CazzT said:You didn't understand what I said. Read it again.
If the object is there but with no texture. It's a delay in the loading of it.
- 1
-
43 minutes ago, Shepard_Fury said:They did add a cool down for the tribe name change, i just don't remember how long the CD was o.0
I remember something about two weeks, but I'm not inertly sure if that is correct tho..
Google is giving me different info on it
I know that they did something to fix this, so Atlas should be able to do the same
However more then a CD is need in my opinion!
You just have to restart
-
Togglabe with decent colour and flag border/position (of your territory) would be the best
-
Still no news from Devs? Still free to hack?
-
Once they will solve the offline raid meta, I hope they will make boarding the ship viable again (limiting in some way the NPC swivel)
-
4 hours ago, Kummba said:I AM PVE.
What u do (spam) is useless, the devs know, they did fix / ban for other cheats (with evidence).
Did you read the reply of the ChemB guy about 300%+ carabine combined with skill, i belief.
You see they are working on PVP things like offline protection, maybe the new claim system helps with claim zerging too.
This game is rather a marathon then a sprint, dont expect reactions to YOUR topic on a daily base.
You don't say? An hacker replying he is not hacking?
Hack works w/o problems on atlas. That's the main problem. I don't see any action taken. Do you? On hack forum there is no reported ban so far. ^^.
We have only to thanks the commercial hack is very expansive
- 1
-
15 minutes ago, boomervoncannon said:Why does the fact he plays pve imply to you his eyesight is bad or his ability to evaluate evidence is poor? Jurors don’t have to be lawyers, they just have to be able to weigh evidence. He’s presented cogent reasons why he doesn’t find the evidence compelling. In response all you’ve done is imply he’s unfit to evaluate it, but provided no basis for this line of reasoning.
Where did I write it? Oo
He answered like he plays on a pve server, I asked him about that. He replied and I told him my point of view on the purpose of this kind of topic. That's all. Everyone are free to talk.
It's useless to talk about validating proofs or not. Who met these hackers have left or are here fighting for attention from the Devs. That's all.
Real proof has to be gathered by Devs. We can't really do much.
-
7 minutes ago, Jean Lafitte said:Then you should have supposed the serious one as well. Now, are you going to provide solid proof or just point fingers?
Sorry? I already send Devs proof cuz they asked for it. No answer. (The only proof you can actually provide of an aimbot is getting oneshotting in any situation w/o a single miss) we can't do much more, Devs have the way to check it
All this topic raising about hackers is not done to make you believe in something. It's to force Devs to give an answer to a serious problems that they are ignoring.
That's our only weapons against hackers.
If many of your mates had quitted cuz of aimbotter you would have not given that "serious pve answer" and you would be concerned like us for a game we love.
-
Just now, Jean Lafitte said:Both.
Yeah I supposed the pve one. ^^
-
4 minutes ago, Jean Lafitte said:Ok, I've looked at all these posts claiming hacking. And while I have no doubt that hacking is occuring, the vast majority of the 'evidence' I've seen so far has been dubious or anecdotal.
Of those threads you've shown above, only one definitely shows a hacker using a well known tool to cheat with. All of the others prove nothing and provide no concrete evidence. A chick swimming naked in the ocean dying to one bullet isn't all that surprising. A video of a guy running around killing wolves and bitching for 10 minutes about hacking is not proof. A picture of a floating bear is not proof of hacking. It is proof that the game is bugged. I've seen flying crewmembers and bears myself that had nothing to do with hacking. I've had a carriage floating in my harbor for days now not even attached to a horse.
If you want me to believe, show me. Provide concrete evidence and I'll jump on your bandwagon. Until then, I remain skeptical.
Are you serious or just a pve player?
-
3 hours ago, Mephos said:as if they could do anything against cheaters .. be realistic
They have to check and ban/wipe everything linked with that account.
Easy.
If they want to play again they have to buy new account (and working around hd / IP ban if it is done)
-
7 hours ago, Kanwulf said:when you make up one part of your story why would anyone believe the rest of it?
Are you serious?
The fact that players can hack w/o consequences is serious matter. Friends and honest players are leaving cuz of that.
-
They are in H5. Still oneshotting thing randomly xD
Atlas: the offline griefing simulator
in General Discussion
Posted
Totally agree with you