I was jus wondering why Atlas feels that random boxes and other player structures like signs need such a long decay timer compared to a players base.. We own an Island in A3 on the PVE server and have had a few companies quit playing long enough for their base to be demolished.. Yet random boxes and structures such as farmhouses have ridiculously long decay timers on them. Wouldn't it make sense that if they were gone long enough for their base to decay that their owned structures should follow suit. Anyone else agree with that thought?
It always annoys me when I see an island littered with signs and random boxes that really serve no purpose other than to impede current players from building or navigating the island for no reason
Why do boxes last longer than bases
in General Discussion
Posted
I was jus wondering why Atlas feels that random boxes and other player structures like signs need such a long decay timer compared to a players base.. We own an Island in A3 on the PVE server and have had a few companies quit playing long enough for their base to be demolished.. Yet random boxes and structures such as farmhouses have ridiculously long decay timers on them. Wouldn't it make sense that if they were gone long enough for their base to decay that their owned structures should follow suit. Anyone else agree with that thought?
It always annoys me when I see an island littered with signs and random boxes that really serve no purpose other than to impede current players from building or navigating the island for no reason