RolandRitter

23 hours ago, crazywildfire said:

So we comparing apples and oranges are we?

First of all it is 2 different games. As you said Ark years ago vs how long again on Atlas? Atlas is still in its early development stages. As it was said give it time and see what happens with it. Ark has also had its ups and downs as well. Either way 2 different games here if you want Ark go play Ark. This game shouldn't be exactly like Ark. I will say sure it still needs some work done to it but that is part of EA games.

I lasted 10 hours  in atlas when it was released, it was to fundamentally flawed. I will play it again when the player count hits 50k. If this doesnt happen ill never touch it again.

Atlas steam charts: started with 50k players, current: a mere 7k

Ark steam charts: started with 80k players years ago, current: 83k

that says it all about how many things are wrong with atlas

3 hours ago, Unknown1305 said:

 

An infestation to its finest as it can be called.

While your post is funny-ish, it´s the typical "lets declare them pathogens or vermin so that we can deny them any human attributes then we can hate and genozide them more easily"

Just saying lol.

There’s like no land. Each server has like 1/50 of the landmass of one ark, leaving literally no room to play. You cannot build a remote hidden base either. And if you could, you couldn’t even respawn there lol  

what a total failure

which is so wrong if its true (and an indication in what a failed state the game would be), because if its true it means the majority of players have to play there because they werent quick enough to claim land lol