Black

Hey, I think instead of having 4 vitamins there should be a "meat" and "fruits and vegetables" bar or something like that. It can have different names but having to get fruit fish berries and vegetables is very very annoying. I think it'd make the game a bit more enjoyable because you wont have to worry about maintaining 4 stacks of food in your inventory at any given time.

So, my conclusion is that Atlas is unplayable. With the FPS having aids and the rubber banding every third of a second i just can't play. Y'all wildcard kids think they funny lmao but cmon this isn't even a joke at this point. If anyone knows how to fix this PLEASE lmk.

I noticed that the FPS capped at 30 when playing Atlas on any graphics. I can run ark on epic at 60 so I know my computer can handle it. Is there any way to change this or is it just like that for now until they update the game?

Just now, Ralpo said:

Ahooy, dev pirates!

After the official Eraly Acces Launch Phase, please use a big part of what you guys earned to hire a team that is totally focused on improving the UI/UX. This whill increase the immersion and might remove the "Ark 2.0" comments. This will also be a good way to show the community that you are here to improve the game and make it what everybody wants from it.

Don't focus all your resources on new content, when your basic UI/UX looks really bad.

Also, the font you' ve guys used ingame and even here, on forums, it's really hard to read and makes some people angry (at least 2-3 friends of mine reported that). Just use a simple font and make sure it does not look like Comic Sans MS. 

 

Yea actually i agree

Hey, i'm just wondering if a GTX 1070 and an i5 will be able to run Atlas at at least 60 FPS. I'm not really worried about graphics too much. If there is an easier place for me to get answers be sure to lemme know

5 minutes ago, Realist said:

They aren’t just Megas, but as wildcard said once a square/server goes over the 150 player limit then access will be restricted to the space. 

If a mega has 300 people, all they have to do is have 150 stay at base grinding and building while the other 150 raid on ships.

the kicker is as long as they keep enough people in that square/server they are literally unraidable and invincible

 

gonna be great  

Well there was an opportunity for that in Ark as well because of the 70 players per server. But it wasn't too much of an issue so I wouldn't worry about Atlas.

1 minute ago, Tenebrion said:

Actually, there are 225 individual server squares, each holding (presumably) 150 players. There just happen to only be 15 starting areas.

Ah yes that'd make more sense. Ty

"The ultimate survival MMO of unprecedented scale with 40,000+ simultaneous players in the same world." What happened to 40k? From what i see there are 15 servers and only 150 players allowed on each. 150 x 15 = 40 000 apparently. Great job WC/GS!