Dude, stop using a new line for every single sentence. This isnt WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger.
To make it easier to respond to all that BS, i ordered it into numbers.
1.) The difference between Counterstrike and ATLAS is: In Counterstrike, the server managed the teams, so it became even numbers. In ATLAS, there isnt such an option. And because players are lazy, selfish, too dumb or whatever, they cant manage to group up. I wonder why some people can, and others stay solo/duo/trio while complaining.
2.) There is a lack of counter-measures? Doubt it. I could tell you how to fight larger companies, but well... if you cant find out by yourself, its your problem.
3.) Read 2.)
4.) There is. A very simple one. A very, very simple one. I could tell you, but well... read last part of 2.) HINT: No 2nd account needed, no erased character needed.
5.) I could ask you why you complain about another company being able to fight back after you attacked them, but I wont.
6.) You can.
7.) Oh, you want to have the same benefits without the effort to group up with other people? Do you complain at work that people who group up while working on projects finish their work faster than you, working solo?
8.) You dont, but obviously, this game isnt made for you anyways.
9.) Yeah, too many snowflakes around these days.
10.) Its hard for some people to realize that they cant expect a Porsche when buying a Volvo. Obviously, the game is made for players that can handle the circumstances. You´re not one of them, it seems. So you´d better look out for a game that fits your playstyle/skills.
11.) The total player count, counting in the reviews just shows that players bought an early access game, while expecting a bug free final release game.
12.) Risks of being a large company: Players losing interest. Players forming own groups within the company. Company becomes an interesting target for other large companies. Company gets invaded by insiders. Thats just a few. Theres more. But you didnt even try to think about it, since you only see your own point of view, not even trying to think outside the box. Thats why you wrote 2.), 3.) and 4.)
13. Read 12.), you dont need to repeat yourself.
14.) Thanks god you´re not a game designer/developer. I highly doubt that you´d be able to decide what a proper game design is.
15.) You forgot to complain that people can have more health than you, due to higher level.
16.) Read 15.)
18.) You basically ask why people dont get punished for not playing solo/duo/trio. In a multiplayer game. Thats cute.
19.) More fair? For whom? Only for solo/duo/trio players, obviously. You ask for drawbacks and risks for players in a larger company than yours. What if the larger company has 20 players, max level 40, while you sit in your highly effective deffed base, with a group of just 4 level 120 players? Is that fair? I doubt it.
20. Typical "blabla i dont care about this game blabla thats why i waste my time here in the forums blabla".