Eli

We just put up the support system a couple days ago. If you were submitting these, it definitely was not through the support system and can be very easily overlooked, as is the usual case when a fairly small team has to oversee a massive, passionate, and vocal player base.

I would think that since you're the author of the review that you would know if it's true or not.

ok guys.

I've opened up your company.

A raft is not a cargo hauler.

Rafts have the second lowest SoD aggro range right next to dinghys, and have one of the highest, if not the undisputed highest, sailing speed among ships. These factors should more than easily allow for a player on a raft to evade these perils.

So does this mean you believe that the mature thing to do is to derail a thread by kicking up a fuss over what you yourself admitted to be a "slight" disturbance? It is a non-issue. His post in this thread is a non-issue. Move on and either ignore the user, discuss something relevant to the topic, or just stop perusing a thread with a user you dislike. As to the OP, Ships of the Damned are still being monitored for balance changes. Unfortunately that's one of the things that can easily slip past QA because well, knowledge and experience can easily blind a person with bias. We all in testing end up having knowledge about how the myriad creatures and enemies work so what ends up easy to us due to experience could end up being a difficult battle for those that have yet to encounter them.

If you report a member's post, any disciplinary action taken affects the User. As for this specific user in mind, there is nothing disrespectful nor harassing about saying "maybe because it's a sloop". While it's true that it does downplay what damage that type of ship can dish out, it in no way disrespects anyone.

You can edit your post now.

You should be able to edit your posts now.

You already have a server advertisement thread. Bump that instead of constantly making new ones.

This isn't enough information for us to go on. The images you've provided show us wreckage but there's a myriad factors that can contribute to a ship sinking. - water depth and wind conditions can cause a ship to keep bashing into the shallows and damage the lower planks, specially if it's rocky underneath. - weight of the cargo can cause a ship to sink - if the amount of crew on a boat exceeds it capacity it can sink - wear and tear can cause a boat to sink I'm not ruling out the possibility that there could be a bug that is causing the issue, but the first best step towards resolving an issue is being able to reliably replicate it. The situations you have provided do not give us much information on how to do that.

Looks fine to me.

The official servers are comprised of multiple servers all interconnected. To put it in ARK terms, the more servers you have clustered together, the bigger your Atlas world is.

I gotchu fam. Deleted your company so you can start fresh.

I've gone ahead and deleted your company for you.

You're right that 40,000 was the expectation, and we set it above and beyond that. The number of people that were trying to squeeze into that 40,000 people wide doorway however, far exceeded even what we had set above and beyond that.

You seem to be complaining about a different matter entirely. I'm addressing the issue about connecting on to servers, which is something that we did try to account for. Like I said, even with all the planning we did, the sheer amount of people trying to connect from the americas, from europe, from china, oceania, etc. all still vastly exceeded those plans.

This is a situation that, given the scale and size of how much people looked forward to this, just could not properly be accounted for. Did we account for mass purchases of the game when it's made available? Yes we did, yet steam still got all wonky. Did we account for tons of players from all over the world trying to join in the moment the servers go up? You bet. Yet even then actuality still vastly exceeded our already sizeable preparations. It's just one of those situations where you plan big, then plan bigger than your big plan, but your plans still don't size up to the situation at hand.

Sea turtles, mate.

I mean, we quite literally said we're investigating the connection issues, but sure, we don't care.

It's removed now.

Lemme know the company name and I can delete it for you.

I recommend looking through our companies section to find one that fits your tastes.

What name do you want it changed to?