Jump to content

eeeceee

Pathfinder
  • Content Count

    798
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by eeeceee


  1. On 11/25/2020 at 3:01 PM, ATLAS said:
    1. Increase player recuperation. Survival games can be tough and we want to make sure that players can be devastating to one another, but that the losing side player doesn't have to feel like they are starting over each time. We also want to make small companies and lone wolves more viable. 

    We still have a ways to go before we reach these goals. We know that we are not there yet and that the current state of ATLAS does not reflect what we envision .Most of what we have implemented so far is still in its beginning stages, and are only just setting the foundation for how the gameplay is going to evolve.

     

    Developing survival games appears to be even tougher and we want to make sure you have a barrel in your face for no reason so yeah stop talking about things like you are smart.

    What do you actually envision? Something not stupid? That would be a good foundation that you could evolve from.


  2. 23 minutes ago, DreadSaberPhil said:

    It was automated:  "

    Greetings Pathfinder,

    Thank you for putting in this support ticket. Your submission has been placed under review.
    Please note that during Early Access, in-game support is not available

    "in-game support" sounds very professional. What is out of game support? Is that available?

    "In-game" support seems to mean that people playing in the game don't get support, so if people aren't playing in the game are they able to get support from this automated response?

    Somehow, I think that out-game support is not available also.

    Quote

    and utilizing this ticketing system is a way to identify game issues and trends for things we need to look into and fix from a technical/development point of view. At this phase in our development cycle

    Wat phase waz that againz? lol

    Quote

    , we will not be providing restoration for any items, creatures, ships or other in-game assets.

    This is unfortunately what the devs have always done, they do not like to help restoring things, unless they can destroy more things.

    Quote

    Please note that if you are wanting to report a bug that you’ve experienced with the game, you can do so here:
    https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScwedjFUhMmNo0gR1XC5H5be7mqWSyhM86eFMy5pubJaHresQ/viewform?pli=1

    What did you report? Was it a bug that you experienced with a game? Have you tried clicking on this sacred link?

    Quote

    If you are experiencing technical issues, please upload your dxdiag report and crash dump logs by visiting the link below:
    https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfcf2Ph3zLe0ZKX9yAYVJ5tNGyToJU7dPQ7jSuANRm9ygqofQ/viewform

    Maybe what you reported was a technical issue, and they didn't read what you wrote and you should click on that link instead? Whatever, not listening, here's some more general advice if you feel a numbing sensation in your arm maybe you should consider that you are having a stroke?

    Quote

    We appreciate the time you’ve taken in letting us know about the problem and for your patience during this stage of development. We apologize for any inconvenience caused and are looking to patch out bugs and exploits as soon as possible.

    Happy Sailing!

    "

     

    I earned the gold with salvage.  I had about 3000 extra and the crew has a 7 day countdown to claim but my property only says locked.  I rebuilt on a new island with a new salvage sloop now looking for sugars.  Harvesting game gotta harvest. 

    Yarrrrrr


  3. In pve, not really. You should be able to demo after a while. Did you pay gold for this ship? Thats a bummer if you did, because crew also costs gold. Good news is that you can try again when these dudes wipe again.

    I like how they replied that they won't restore items, did the reply mention anything else? Did it look like an automated reply? Did they mention anything about the problem that you described? Do you think they will look at what the problem might be? Do you think they will say to you anything other than "we wont restore items lol"?


  4. I thought you said bye? Then you just spam it up and try to attack me?

    That is a bit suspicous.

    Are you ok?

    Devil's advocate? More like braindead, hah

    The EA side only became a significant issue after the abrupt NA PVP wipe? Oh, OKAY. That makes every thing you spam okay, and everyone else is absurd.

    Lol enormous windfall out your ass/mouth. Big bunch of hot air spammed up on the forums.

    You haven't responded to anything i say, and when you try to, it appears that you are unable to control that enormous windfall, so you resort to things a oompa loompa would do and make statements without providing an explanation, then ironically ask for an explanation when people reply hey man are you a moron or a troll? Obviously.... You are the one that needs to explain.

    Or you just say bye and retreat out of the conversation


  5. 1 hour ago, PiszkosFred said:

    Ok, let me reverse the situation and ask a question:

    What you say, how realist is that before this season every single poor fellow pirate

    Very realist

    Quote

    could build a Galleon within a day or two? Less with animals, more with bare hands? Schooner and Brig was a question of hours. None used a sloop, everyone started with a schooner.

    Do you think nobody used a raft also? If so, you need to ltp or just stop spamming on the forums.

    Quote

    Even now, in season 4, with a buggy, messy and not working trade system WITHIN A SAME GRID could you make a 50k income within a two week (i did 22k in 6 day with only 2 partners and literally i did not nothing, in every 5 mins i got 1-10 gold/trade/partner). If trade will go outside of the grid, the gold bonus will go higher, so more gold will come (x2, x3, etc), then you will get that ammount faster.

    What? 2 weeks? If trade goes outside the grid it will go higher?? Oh ok, so its not so bad that you are just talking about something that is stupid because after 2 weeks you will have something and then maybe if trade goes outside your grid you get higher and faster. Those 2 weeks almost makes me forget that game is going to wiped in 4 weeks or something. Sounds fun.

    Quote

    I dont mind, if the ships has "value", if you need work for it, even if its hard or long.

    Hope you don't mind if I have something hard and long.

    Quote

    We talking about Galleons, the biggest haulers of the seas, cmon, not a simple boat...

    Simple you say?

    Quote

    OR, lets convert the Atlas into an arcade game

    Are you trolling?

    Quote

    , or even "better" (/sarcasm), into a battle royale: everyone spawn with a ship and go, pewpew each other, then the last one wins. Resources? Taming? Golds? Bosses? No need, just free ship and cannonballs...

    OK.

    Quote

    The required gold ammount for a ship need to be balanced, thats true

    What makes you say it is required? Are you sick in the head?

    Quote

    and the method of aquiring gold is also need to be changed.

    What is your plan?

    Quote

    But remember, in these days not a single thing is working in the game, not even a sailing with these lags and rubberbanding. We talking about ideas, new methods, tests - and we are the labrats. Nothing is final.

     

    Thanks for the valuable post


  6. Just build a new ship. If you don't have a company, and you click create company, your ship should stay in the company, so that is weird. There is an option that can make things you own before making or joining a company get locked out, but i think the default setting should move your stuff into your company when you click create for the first time.


  7. 7 hours ago, Commander_Peace said:

    I have played over 500 hours of Atlas

    I understand the reason behind adding a gold price to make ships

    Can you tell everybody what is this reason?

    7 hours ago, Commander_Peace said:

    I am okay with adding a gold price to ships but not this extreme.

    Why?

    7 hours ago, Commander_Peace said:

    I feel like 1,000 gold for schooner 5,000 for brig and 10,000 for a galleon is still pretty expensive enough to make ships scarce but still makes the game playable.

    Why does it seem like your goal is to make ships scarce?

    7 hours ago, Commander_Peace said:

    When creating a game it is important to make the game challenging otherwise people will get bored of the game and move on but at the same time the game can not be a big enough burden to play otherwise the average person will not stick around, of course you will always have your extremist like me who have alot of time to play the game but at the same time at the end of the day it is just a video game, not a second job.

    Stfu and farm gold. 😛

    7 hours ago, Commander_Peace said:

     

    Players should not have to spend 8 hours a day over a course of many days grinding gold just to get a ship big enough to sail around in.

    Ok.


  8. Why do you think i talk a load of well you err "no". I can see english is not your first language, so I am trying to understand what you type there. But surely, you can understand when I ask what are you talking about, and do you have any explanation or are you just talking shit?

    Your OP says schooners should be free, and I agreed with you. I actually even went further and said that all ships including galleon should be free, because there is no reason why not. You then replied with a post that attacked me, which was quite weird, telling me that i'm not trying. Then, you have now replied with another post that shows that maybe you are the one still not trying, saying that i talk a load of well you "no" even though, as I've tried to explain, I agreed with you. Funny.

    Also funny how another person who seems to lack a grasp of english liked your post, seems to be a sad attempt to avoid the context of the thread while just latching on to anything that appears to be negative about me. Or you know, english?


  9. Any reason why? Or do we have to pay you?

    Get rid of rafts, ramshackles and sloops? A ramshackle is a sloop. Ramshackle sloop was made to help people get out of freeport, they are cheap and are crap, but nobody that i played with has ever said yeh get rid of them for no reason. What are you basing your preference on? I have built many ramshackle sloops to get the foy or to help someone with a powerstone, and never had a problem with them. My enemies also never had a problem. Rafts are no problems either. Rafts and sloops can be fun.

    If you gave me a free schooner, i would create a character, merge it in to my company, and then repeat. Save 5k and avoid stupid gimmicks.

     


  10. 19 hours ago, Ranger1k said:

    (aside from the one I'm keeping to myself for now). Even that needs some tweaking i think based on some other posts I've read.

    Did you pay to play early access or what? Why would you pay to help a game, and then repeatedly state that you don't want to help unless you get paid? Sidenote I think you are correct about the reading more.

    19 hours ago, Ranger1k said:

         Also some people have proposed allowing 1 vessel to be uploaded into the "cloud". This is also a possible solution but needs to be implemented correctly or some poor raiders will find Gallys unexpectedly raining down on them 🤣. Also it presents a possible intelligence gathering dilemma for raiders, specifically, how do they choose a target if they don't know the approximate strength of their adversary?

    Some people say 1 vessel? Why just 1? Why would they be poor raiders if gallys suddenly appeared? If you go to attack someone, and they have no gallys, that is sad, but then if they have gallys suddenly appear, that would be fun. Sheesh. Possible intelligence gathering dilemma indeed.


  11. 12 hours ago, Ranger1k said:

    Let me get this straight, you say that I DON'T have a clue yet you then go on to describe PvP as lacking PvE? Of course PvP still has Players verus Environment. Lions, tigers, bears, snakes etc all the fauna still exists theres just different rules regarding player engagement. This is possibly the dumbest thing said on this forum. Like ever. Like EVER, ever..ever

    Yes, you have no clue. PVE is PVP without the PVP.

    I didn't say PVP lacks PVE.

    You are just too braindead unfortunately to read I guess, or know how to play a game.

    12 hours ago, Ranger1k said:

    Actually i suggested he consider joining an existing company. I would take it a step further and say that you intentionally reworded the statement in a futile attempt to "win" an argument. Furthermore anyone whos familiar with my posts knows i have knowledge regarding the game on both PvP AND PvE. Anybody whos familiar with your posts knows that

    A. Your a troll

    B. You claim to have uninstalled this game long ago

    THAT was my response when I realized OP was definitely referring to PvP. I even put a *disclaimer* in the first post that my "tips" may not work or require adjusting for PvP. I played PvP for about 90% of the 4th season half the time in a company and half solo. I didn't enjoy playing as a solo-pvp-settler because of all the additional defensive structures I'd have to build and maintain to have a CHANCE of defending against being offline raided. Also this was BEFORE the schooner cost 5k. Therefore i took a break the last few weeks, played something else, and came back this season on PvE to check out the new mechanics.

    Regarding the rest of your nonsensical, blathering drivel and intentionally twisted qoutes I'll just do what i normally do w your nonsense, ill ignore it.

    Eeeceee you ARE the reason for the advice not to play checkers w a pigeon... It goes like this...

          Person 1 "Ya know why you should NEVER play checkers w a pigeon?"

          Person 2 "Why?"

         Person 1 "Because no matter what move you make, the pigeon will just step on the board, shit all over it and then strut around like it won"

    Buh bye E

     

    To OP, @Ali_knight, i tried messaging a friend who owns a PvP island to see if he would accept a random solo settler or a recruit that I've never played with and he never got back to me. He asked me to join his company on PvP, i declined, so i dunno if he's grumpy w me, adverse to accepting randoms or just missed my message. Many companies (not all though) in PvP don't accept randoms, only recruits that a member is clearly willing to vouche for. I've never played w ya so i can't vouche for ya, sorry. I DO appreciate your thanks and i SYMPATHIZE with your complaints regarding startup costs.

    I have some posts in Announcements that states every player should begin the game w a free schooner, then possibly pay 5k if it needs to be replaced. If you agree w the idea or have something to add then bumping it, liking it and/ or quoting it may get the devs attention. If you don't like the idea thats ok also.

    Also one of the Devs most recent Q & A posts (in Announcements also) states that they relize the games current mechanics are driving away solos, small companies and casual players and that they're looking into solutions. Time will tell.

    Have a nice day everyone. Time for some turkey and playin Atlas now that I'm done playing checkers w EEECEEE.

    Whatever, cbf reading this spam, except I did skim over the part about "intentional rewording" lol. Where was that?


  12. On 11/25/2020 at 4:17 AM, Chucksteak said:

    WTF are you talking about? Read it again. Your boat becomes anchored, nothing was said about parking. In my statement, your immune vessel cannot deal or receive dmg, so you would do nothing to me. We would get along splendidly. While I'm offline, you can still attack my land base, but at least I can still play the game when I get back.

    Anchored seems awfully close to parking.

    lol?

    Is vessels the only thing that do a thing to you?

    Yeah im sure we get along... oh yeah wait i remember, you're the one that likes to just rebuild things.


  13. If you had a clue, you would know my point. Even if you didn't have a clue, you should still see the point. PVP is just PVE without the PVE.

    Your comment "maybe you should try getting a company .... pvp is rough" in reply to someone making a point about the game (which you appear to lack any knowledge on) shows that you like to make excuses, due to your lack of knowledge.

    edit: That someone was making a point about game balance in PVP, and yet you are playing PVE, which is just the PVP without the PVP, so what do you do? You suggest hey get a company. Then tomorrow you will go back to talking about your PVE experience again in some other post. To me, I only just need to realise that PVE is PVP without the PVP, and I would try to think about game balance/OP complaining that they can't play solo without needing a company that carries them. It is maybe still possible to play solo, but its become less fun due to game balance.


  14. 11 hours ago, Ranger1k said:

     First off, love ya bro ....i assure that my intention isn't to insult, i reserve that for eeecee 😁. Most recent patch notes indicate lots of changes and plans evolving ... Sorry to debate ya dood but i think your mistaken, time will tell.

    Cringe

    10 hours ago, Whitehawk said:

    I love dark and light, but 3 years later still ea. Outlaws of the old west still ea.

    Yeh same

×
×
  • Create New...